THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SHANTUBEN GOBARBHAI BARAIYA — 339/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN050004742026

Filing Number

339/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

339/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA

Judge

5-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198035250973

Police Station

MAHUVA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHANTUBEN GOBARBHAI BARAIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Order

    The court convicted Shantuben Gobarbhai Baraiya under IPC Section 275 (Provision Act) and sentenced her to a fine of ₹500 with 5 days simple imprisonment as an alternative. The judgment, delivered on May 15, 2026, considered the accused's poor economic circumstances, family dependence on her, and first-time offender status to impose a lenient sentence below the statutory minimum, emphasizing that imprisonment would adversely affect her family's sustenance and welfare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 339/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Shantuben Gobarbhai Baraiya under IPC Section 275 (Provision Act) and sentenced her to a fine of ₹500 with 5 days simple imprisonment as an alternative. The judgment, delivered on May 15, 2026, considered the accused's poor economic circumstances, family dependence on her, and first-time offender status to impose a lenient sentence below the statutory minimum, emphasizing that imprisonment would adversely affect her family's sustenance and welfare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case