GUJ. LAXMIBAI BHIKHABHAI KAVAD NA VARSO GUJ. TEJABHAI BHIKHABHAI KAVAD NA VARSO vs DEPUTY COLLECTOR SHRI MAHUVA — 1/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,34. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 02nd April 2026.
CMA SC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - SR/CIVIL/SMALL CAUSE COU
CNR: GJBN050000532026
Filing Number
1/2026
Filing Date
05-01-2026
Registration No
1/2026
Registration Date
05-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA
Judge
5-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GUJ. LAXMIBAI BHIKHABHAI KAVAD NA VARSO GUJ. TEJABHAI BHIKHABHAI KAVAD NA VARSO
Adv. B N KAVAD
Respondent(s)
DEPUTY COLLECTOR SHRI MAHUVA
KARYPALAK EJNEER SHRI MAHUVA
Hearing History
Judge: 5-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 09-03-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
| 24-02-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 1/2026 The Principal Senior Civil Court at Mahuva ordered that the petitioners Laxmibai and Tejabhai (co-heirs in a land acquisition case) be paid compensation of ₹3,88,112.25 deposited by the respondent (Deputy Collector/Executive Engineer), which the petitioners sought to withdraw. The court approved the petitioners' application, finding that the respondent had deposited the compensation amount in court, filed no appeal against the judgment, and raised no objection to disbursement. The court directed the Registrar to pay the compensation to petitioner Udaybhai Tejabhai Kavad (the authorized representative) by account payee check with interest, upon verification of identity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1/2026 The Principal Senior Civil Court at Mahuva ordered that the petitioners Laxmibai and Tejabhai (co-heirs in a land acquisition case) be paid compensation of ₹3,88,112.25 deposited by the respondent (Deputy Collector/Executive Engineer), which the petitioners sought to withdraw. The court approved the petitioners' application, finding that the respondent had deposited the compensation amount in court, filed no appeal against the judgment, and raised no objection to disbursement. The court directed the Registrar to pay the compensation to petitioner Udaybhai Tejabhai Kavad (the authorized representative) by account payee check with interest, upon verification of identity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts