THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION vs kalpeshabhai rameshabhai vegad — 1972/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN040033972025
e-Filing Number
13-10-2025
Filing Number
1972/2025
Filing Date
23-Dec-2025
Registration No
1972/2025
Registration Date
23-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALAJA
Judge
1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
372
Police Station
ALANG POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION
Respondent(s)
-
1.kalpeshabhai rameshabhai vegad
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 1972/2025 The court convicted Kalpeshabhai Rameshabhai Vegad under the Motor Vehicles Act (Section 185) and IPC Section 64(1) for drunk driving. Recognizing the accused's first offense, poor socioeconomic background, and role as the family's sole breadwinner, the court imposed reduced sentencing: a fine of Rs. 2,100 instead of the statutory minimum, and three days of simple imprisonment instead of the full prescribed term. The court exercised its discretionary authority to impose lenient punishment while emphasizing that such conduct should not be repeated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1972/2025
Case Summary: 1972/2025 The court convicted Kalpeshabhai Rameshabhai Vegad under the Motor Vehicles Act (Section 185) and IPC Section 64(1) for drunk driving. Recognizing the accused's first offense, poor socioeconomic background, and role as the family's sole breadwinner, the court imposed reduced sentencing: a fine of Rs. 2,100 instead of the statutory minimum, and three days of simple imprisonment instead of the full prescribed term. The court exercised its discretionary authority to impose lenient punishment while emphasizing that such conduct should not be repeated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts