THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION vs kalpeshabhai rameshabhai vegad — 1972/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN040033972025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

13-10-2025

Filing Number

1972/2025

Filing Date

23-12-2025

Registration No

1972/2025

Registration Date

23-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA

Judge

1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

372

Police Station

ALANG POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 185
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

kalpeshabhai rameshabhai vegad

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

02-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

20-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

21-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: 1972/2025 The court convicted Kalpeshabhai Rameshabhai Vegad under the Motor Vehicles Act (Section 185) and IPC Section 64(1) for drunk driving. Recognizing the accused's first offense, poor socioeconomic background, and role as the family's sole breadwinner, the court imposed reduced sentencing: a fine of Rs. 2,100 instead of the statutory minimum, and three days of simple imprisonment instead of the full prescribed term. The court exercised its discretionary authority to impose lenient punishment while emphasizing that such conduct should not be repeated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1972/2025 The court convicted Kalpeshabhai Rameshabhai Vegad under the Motor Vehicles Act (Section 185) and IPC Section 64(1) for drunk driving. Recognizing the accused's first offense, poor socioeconomic background, and role as the family's sole breadwinner, the court imposed reduced sentencing: a fine of Rs. 2,100 instead of the statutory minimum, and three days of simple imprisonment instead of the full prescribed term. The court exercised its discretionary authority to impose lenient punishment while emphasizing that such conduct should not be repeated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case