THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION vs SANJAYBHAI NANUBHAI MAKVANA — 1941/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN040033502025

Filing Number

1941/2025

Filing Date

16-Dec-2025

Registration No

1941/2025

Registration Date

16-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

456

Police Station

ALANG POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANJAYBHAI NANUBHAI MAKVANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court ordered a Stop Proceeding under CrPC Section 258 against accused Sanjaybhai Nanubhai Makvana, acquitting him of charges under IPC Section 135, as he could not be produced despite repeated summons and warrants. The court found no impediment to reopening proceedings in future if warranted by the government and police with the accused's details available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 07-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 16-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 16-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1941/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court ordered a Stop Proceeding under CrPC Section 258 against accused Sanjaybhai Nanubhai Makvana, acquitting him of charges under IPC Section 135, as he could not be produced despite repeated summons and warrants. The court found no impediment to reopening proceedings in future if warranted by the government and police with the accused's details available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case