THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION vs GADABHAI VALJIBHAI SOLANKI — 1933/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,85(1)(2). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN040033432025
Filing Number
1933/2025
Filing Date
16-12-2025
Registration No
1933/2025
Registration Date
16-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALAJA
Judge
1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
466
Police Station
ALANG POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION
Respondent(s)
GADABHAI VALJIBHAI SOLANKI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 28-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 21-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 07-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 1933/2025 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Talaja court ordered to stop proceedings under CrPC Section 258 against respondent Gadabhai Valjibhai Solanki and acquitted him of charges under IPC Sections 447(1) and 448(1)(2). The court noted that despite repeated summons and warrants, the accused could not be produced, making continued prosecution impractical. The government and APP were informed of the accused's details, preserving the right to initiate fresh proceedings in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1933/2025 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Talaja court ordered to stop proceedings under CrPC Section 258 against respondent Gadabhai Valjibhai Solanki and acquitted him of charges under IPC Sections 447(1) and 448(1)(2). The court noted that despite repeated summons and warrants, the accused could not be produced, making continued prosecution impractical. The government and APP were informed of the accused's details, preserving the right to initiate fresh proceedings in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts