THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION vs RUSHI VRAT MADHUSUDAN PAADYE — 1927/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN040033172025

e-Filing Number

21-11-2025

Filing Number

1927/2025

Filing Date

12-Dec-2025

Registration No

1927/2025

Registration Date

12-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

450

Police Station

ALANG POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RUSHI VRAT MADHUSUDAN PAADYE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court stopped proceedings against respondent Rushi Vrat Madhusudan Paadye under CrPC Section 258 and acquitted him of charges under IPC Sections 447(1) and 85(1)(2), finding insufficient evidence. The court noted the accused was never produced despite repeated summons and warrants, rendering continued prosecution unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 12-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1927/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings against respondent Rushi Vrat Madhusudan Paadye under CrPC Section 258 and acquitted him of charges under IPC Sections 447(1) and 85(1)(2), finding insufficient evidence. The court noted the accused was never produced despite repeated summons and warrants, rendering continued prosecution unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case