THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG MARINE POLICE STATION vs AJAYBHAI ALIAS BHENSO DEVABHAI MAKVANA — 1899/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN040032782025

e-Filing Number

03-12-2025

Filing Number

1899/2025

Filing Date

10-Dec-2025

Registration No

1899/2025

Registration Date

10-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA

Judge

6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

210

Police Station

ALANG MARINE POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG MARINE POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJAYBHAI ALIAS BHENSO DEVABHAI MAKVANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted Ajaybhai (respondent) under IPC Section 65(a)(a) and sentenced him to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 100, or in default, simple imprisonment for 5 days. The court reduced the sentence from the prescribed punishment considering the accused's background as a poor family man whose imprisonment would cause hardship to his dependents, while noting his guilty plea and lack of prior criminal history. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1899/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Ajaybhai (respondent) under IPC Section 65(a)(a) and sentenced him to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 100, or in default, simple imprisonment for 5 days. The court reduced the sentence from the prescribed punishment considering the accused's background as a poor family man whose imprisonment would cause hardship to his dependents, while noting his guilty plea and lack of prior criminal history. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case