THE STATE OF GUJARAT DATHA POLICE STATION vs NITINBHAI POPATBHAI BHALIYA — 1809/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN040031512025
e-Filing Number
21-11-2025
Filing Number
1809/2025
Filing Date
28-11-2025
Registration No
1809/2025
Registration Date
28-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALAJA
Judge
6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
291
Police Station
DATHA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT DATHA POLICE STATION
Respondent(s)
NITINBHAI POPATBHAI BHALIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
ORDER
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 05-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 02-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 29-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 1809/2025 The court convicted respondent Nitinbhai Popatbhai Bhaliya under IPC Section 65(a)(a) for criminal intimidation but reduced the sentence to simple imprisonment rather than rigorous imprisonment, considering his status as the sole breadwinner of a poor family. The court imposed a fine of ₹100 and ordered the case appeal to be dismissed, while noting that appropriate lighter punishment was warranted based on the circumstances and mitigating factors presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1809/2025 The court convicted respondent Nitinbhai Popatbhai Bhaliya under IPC Section 65(a)(a) for criminal intimidation but reduced the sentence to simple imprisonment rather than rigorous imprisonment, considering his status as the sole breadwinner of a poor family. The court imposed a fine of ₹100 and ordered the case appeal to be dismissed, while noting that appropriate lighter punishment was warranted based on the circumstances and mitigating factors presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts