THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION vs ARVINDBHAI BHAGATBHAI DIHORA — 1782/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN040030892025

e-Filing Number

02-08-2025

Filing Number

1782/2025

Filing Date

13-Nov-2025

Registration No

1782/2025

Registration Date

13-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

347

Police Station

ALANG POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARVINDBHAI BHAGATBHAI DIHORA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Talaja Magistrate Court convicted respondent Arvindbhai Bhagatbhai Dihora under IPC Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1)(2) based on his voluntary confession of guilt and the investigating agency's case. The court sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for five days under CrPC Section 275, granting him the benefit of having already undergone custody during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 17-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 06-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 13-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 13-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1782/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Talaja Magistrate Court convicted respondent Arvindbhai Bhagatbhai Dihora under IPC Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1)(2) based on his voluntary confession of guilt and the investigating agency's case. The court sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for five days under CrPC Section 275, granting him the benefit of having already undergone custody during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case