THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG MARINE POLICE STATION vs SHRIKANT RADHESHYAM PATEL Advocate - B K PATHAK — 1688/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 81,65(a)(a). Status: PROCESS TO ACCUSED. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN040028952025
Next Hearing
08th July 2026
e-Filing Number
24-09-2025
Filing Number
1688/2025
Filing Date
18-10-2025
Registration No
1688/2025
Registration Date
18-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALAJA
Judge
6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
FIR Details
FIR Number
186
Police Station
ALANG MARINE POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG MARINE POLICE STATION
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SHRIKANT RADHESHYAM PATEL Advocate - B K PATHAK
RAMDEVSINH SHANTUBHA GOHIL
Adv. B K PATHAK
Hearing History
Judge: 6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-05-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 28-05-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 14-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 05-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 1688/2025 The court convicted respondent Shrikant Radheshyam Patel under IPC Section 65(A)(A) and Section 71 (counterfeiting currency). The accused pleaded guilty to the charges. The court, considering his socioeconomic circumstances as a poor family man dependent on daily wages and his first-time offence, reduced the sentence from the statutory minimum. The court sentenced him to imprisonment for a period mentioned in the order with a fine of Rs. 100, or additional simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The case against the co-accused (respondent 2) proceeds separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1688/2025 The court convicted respondent Shrikant Radheshyam Patel under IPC Section 65(A)(A) and Section 71 (counterfeiting currency). The accused pleaded guilty to the charges. The court, considering his socioeconomic circumstances as a poor family man dependent on daily wages and his first-time offence, reduced the sentence from the statutory minimum. The court sentenced him to imprisonment for a period mentioned in the order with a fine of Rs. 100, or additional simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The case against the co-accused (respondent 2) proceeds separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts