MITALBEN DHANRAJGIRI @ DHANGARGIRI GAUSWAMI vs OMKARGIRI KANAIYAGIRI GAUSWAMI Advocate - V D GAUSWAMI — 326/2024

Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 18,19,20,22,23. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJBN040028952024

Filing Number

326/2024

Filing Date

05-Nov-2024

Registration No

326/2024

Registration Date

05-Nov-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA

Judge

6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 18,19,20,22,23

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MITALBEN DHANRAJGIRI @ DHANGARGIRI GAUSWAMI

    Adv. H J OZA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.OMKARGIRI KANAIYAGIRI GAUSWAMI Advocate - V D GAUSWAMI

  2. 2.KANAIYAGIRI MOHANGIRI GAUSWAMI

    Adv. V D GAUSWAMI

  3. 3.REKHABEN KANAIYAGIRI GAUSWAMI

    Adv. V D GAUSWAMI

  4. 4.TRIBHUVANGIRI KANAIYAGIRI GAUSWAMI

    Adv. V D GAUSWAMI

  5. 5.JAYGIRI KANAIYAGIRI GAUSWAMI

    Adv. V D GAUSWAMI

  6. 6.ARTIBEN KANAIYAGIRI GAUSWAMI

    Adv. V D GAUSWAMI

  7. 7.ASMITABEN KANAIYAGIRI GAUSWAMI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition filed by Mitalben Dhanrajgiri Gauswami against Omkargiri and others. The court found that the dispute between the parties had been amicably settled through mutual understanding and compromise, with the settlement executed in accordance with customary practice. Since the underlying matter had been resolved through settlement, the court found no valid grounds to proceed with the petition and ordered it to be dismissed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 31-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 30-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 29-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 19-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 03-Jul-2025

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 05-Jun-2025

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 17-May-2025

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 05-Apr-2025

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 20-Mar-2025

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 13-Mar-2025

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 01-Mar-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 01-Feb-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 04-Jan-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 06-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 05-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 326/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition filed by Mitalben Dhanrajgiri Gauswami against Omkargiri and others. The court found that the dispute between the parties had been amicably settled through mutual understanding and compromise, with the settlement executed in accordance with customary practice. Since the underlying matter had been resolved through settlement, the court found no valid grounds to proceed with the petition and ordered it to be dismissed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case