MITALBEN DHANRAJGIRI @ DHANGARGIRI GAUSWAMI vs OMKARGIRI KANAIYAGIRI GAUSWAMI Advocate - V D GAUSWAMI — 326/2024
Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 18,19,20,22,23. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 12th May 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJBN040028952024
Filing Number
326/2024
Filing Date
05-11-2024
Registration No
326/2024
Registration Date
05-11-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALAJA
Judge
6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
12th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MITALBEN DHANRAJGIRI @ DHANGARGIRI GAUSWAMI
Adv. H J OZA
Respondent(s)
OMKARGIRI KANAIYAGIRI GAUSWAMI Advocate - V D GAUSWAMI
KANAIYAGIRI MOHANGIRI GAUSWAMI
Adv. V D GAUSWAMI
REKHABEN KANAIYAGIRI GAUSWAMI
Adv. V D GAUSWAMI
TRIBHUVANGIRI KANAIYAGIRI GAUSWAMI
Adv. V D GAUSWAMI
JAYGIRI KANAIYAGIRI GAUSWAMI
Adv. V D GAUSWAMI
ARTIBEN KANAIYAGIRI GAUSWAMI
Adv. V D GAUSWAMI
ASMITABEN KANAIYAGIRI GAUSWAMI
Hearing History
Judge: 6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 27-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the petition filed by Mitalben Dhanrajgiri Gauswami against Omkargiri and others. The court found that the dispute between the parties had been amicably settled through mutual understanding and compromise, with the settlement executed in accordance with customary practice. Since the underlying matter had been resolved through settlement, the court found no valid grounds to proceed with the petition and ordered it to be dismissed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the petition filed by Mitalben Dhanrajgiri Gauswami against Omkargiri and others. The court found that the dispute between the parties had been amicably settled through mutual understanding and compromise, with the settlement executed in accordance with customary practice. Since the underlying matter had been resolved through settlement, the court found no valid grounds to proceed with the petition and ordered it to be dismissed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts