THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG MARINE POLICE STATION vs JAGDISHBHAI URFE GHOLI DHANABHAI MAKWANA — 1453/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN040024242025
e-Filing Number
02-09-2025
Filing Number
1453/2025
Filing Date
10-09-2025
Registration No
1453/2025
Registration Date
10-09-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALAJA
Judge
6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
196
Police Station
ALANG MARINE POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG MARINE POLICE STATION
Respondent(s)
JAGDISHBHAI URFE GHOLI DHANABHAI MAKWANA
Hearing History
Judge: 6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
ORDER
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 23-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 13-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the respondent Jagdishbhai under IPC Section 65(A)(A) (receiving stolen property) but reduced the prescribed sentence to a fine of ₹100, citing mitigating circumstances. The court found that while the accused's voluntary plea of guilt and confession supported conviction, his status as a poor family man dependent on daily wages justified imposing a lighter punishment rather than imprisonment to prevent family hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the respondent Jagdishbhai under IPC Section 65(A)(A) (receiving stolen property) but reduced the prescribed sentence to a fine of ₹100, citing mitigating circumstances. The court found that while the accused's voluntary plea of guilt and confession supported conviction, his status as a poor family man dependent on daily wages justified imposing a lighter punishment rather than imprisonment to prevent family hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts