THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG MARINE POLICE STATION vs JAGDISHBHAI URFE GHOLI DHANABHAI MAKWANA — 1453/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN040024242025

e-Filing Number

02-09-2025

Filing Number

1453/2025

Filing Date

10-Sep-2025

Registration No

1453/2025

Registration Date

10-Sep-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA

Judge

6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

196

Police Station

ALANG MARINE POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG MARINE POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAGDISHBHAI URFE GHOLI DHANABHAI MAKWANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the respondent Jagdishbhai under IPC Section 65(A)(A) (receiving stolen property) but reduced the prescribed sentence to a fine of ₹100, citing mitigating circumstances. The court found that while the accused's voluntary plea of guilt and confession supported conviction, his status as a poor family man dependent on daily wages justified imposing a lighter punishment rather than imprisonment to prevent family hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 13-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  8. 13-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1453/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the respondent Jagdishbhai under IPC Section 65(A)(A) (receiving stolen property) but reduced the prescribed sentence to a fine of ₹100, citing mitigating circumstances. The court found that while the accused's voluntary plea of guilt and confession supported conviction, his status as a poor family man dependent on daily wages justified imposing a lighter punishment rather than imprisonment to prevent family hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case