THE STATE OF GUJARAT DATHA POLICE STATION vs kurajibhai devjibhai makavana Advocate - V S DABHI — 1382/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),117(2),352,351(3),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 08th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN040023302025
e-Filing Number
09-06-2025
Filing Number
1382/2025
Filing Date
03-09-2025
Registration No
1382/2025
Registration Date
03-09-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALAJA
Judge
6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
58
Police Station
DATHA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT DATHA POLICE STATION
Adv. H B BAMBHANIYA
Respondent(s)
kurajibhai devjibhai makavana Advocate - V S DABHI
sanjaibhai khatabhai makavana
rahulbhai kurajibhai makavana
asokbhai khatubhai makavana
Hearing History
Judge: 6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 16-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Case 1382/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four defendants (Kurajibhai Devjibhai Makavana, Sanjaibhai Khatabhai Makavana, Ashokbhai Khatabhai Makavana, and Rahulbhai Kurajibhai Makavana) of charges under IPC Sections 117(2), 119(2), 351(3), 352, 54, and GP Act Section 135. The prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; witness testimonies were inconsistent and contradicted the case allegations, while circumstantial evidence alone could not establish the offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Case 1382/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four defendants (Kurajibhai Devjibhai Makavana, Sanjaibhai Khatabhai Makavana, Ashokbhai Khatabhai Makavana, and Rahulbhai Kurajibhai Makavana) of charges under IPC Sections 117(2), 119(2), 351(3), 352, 54, and GP Act Section 135. The prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; witness testimonies were inconsistent and contradicted the case allegations, while circumstantial evidence alone could not establish the offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts