THE STATE OF GUJARAT TALAJA POLICE STATION vs BHAVESHBHAI SANTILALBHAI JOSHI — 1342/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN040022822025
e-Filing Number
18-08-2025
Filing Number
1342/2025
Filing Date
30-Aug-2025
Registration No
1342/2025
Registration Date
30-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALAJA
Judge
1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
406
Police Station
TALAJA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT TALAJA POLICE STATION
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHAVESHBHAI SANTILALBHAI JOSHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court stopped proceedings against the accused Bhaveshbhai Santilalbhai Joshi under CrPC Section 258 and acquitted him of charges under IPC Sections 447 and 85, as the accused failed to appear despite repeated summons and warrants. The court ruled that no obstacle remains for the State to file a fresh case against the accused in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1342/2025
The court stopped proceedings against the accused Bhaveshbhai Santilalbhai Joshi under CrPC Section 258 and acquitted him of charges under IPC Sections 447 and 85, as the accused failed to appear despite repeated summons and warrants. The court ruled that no obstacle remains for the State to file a fresh case against the accused in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts