THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION vs SIKANDAR SULATAN KATAT — 1193/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN040020992025
e-Filing Number
09-07-2025
Filing Number
1193/2025
Filing Date
13-Aug-2025
Registration No
1193/2025
Registration Date
13-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALAJA
Judge
1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
281
Police Station
ALANG POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION
Respondent(s)
-
1.SIKANDAR SULATAN KATAT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court ordered to stop proceedings against respondent Sikandar Sulatan Katat under CrPC Section 258 and acquitted him of the charges. The judgment noted that despite repeated summons and warrants, the accused failed to appear before the court, leading to the decision to terminate the case with no future bar on prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1193/2025
The court ordered to stop proceedings against respondent Sikandar Sulatan Katat under CrPC Section 258 and acquitted him of the charges. The judgment noted that despite repeated summons and warrants, the accused failed to appear before the court, leading to the decision to terminate the case with no future bar on prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts