THE STATE OF GUJARAT DATHA POLICE STATION vs LALITBHAI JINABHAI DATHIYA — 1181/2024
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Status: PROCESS TO ACCUSED. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN040020902024
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
1181/2024
Filing Date
08-08-2024
Registration No
1181/2024
Registration Date
08-08-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALAJA
Judge
6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198014240085
Police Station
DATHA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT DATHA POLICE STATION
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
LALITBHAI JINABHAI DATHIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 03-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 23-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 13-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 1181/2024 The State of Gujarat (Datha Police Station) v. Lalitbhai Jinabhai Dathiya Outcome: The court convicted the respondent under IPC Section 252 (trespass/wrongful restraint). The sentence imposed was reduced from the minimum prescribed punishment to a fine of Rs. 100 only, with the option of one additional day of simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the respondent's voluntary plea, economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and prior conduct in imposing the reduced sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1181/2024 The State of Gujarat (Datha Police Station) v. Lalitbhai Jinabhai Dathiya Outcome: The court convicted the respondent under IPC Section 252 (trespass/wrongful restraint). The sentence imposed was reduced from the minimum prescribed punishment to a fine of Rs. 100 only, with the option of one additional day of simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the respondent's voluntary plea, economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and prior conduct in imposing the reduced sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts