THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION vs BALRAM SHREELAKHANLAL PAL — 1079/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN040019292025
e-Filing Number
29-07-2025
Filing Number
1079/2025
Filing Date
29-Jul-2025
Registration No
1079/2025
Registration Date
29-Jul-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALAJA
Judge
1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
313
Police Station
ALANG POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION
Respondent(s)
-
1.BALRAM SHREELAKHANLAL PAL
-
2.DIPAK BAHADUR SAHANI
-
3.VIJAY MATHURBHAI VAGHELA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court stopped proceedings against the three respondents under Section 258 CrPC and acquitted them of charges under Section 12 of the Gujarat Arms Act. The court found that despite repeated summons and warrant issuance, the accused could not be produced before it. The court also directed the government to forfeit seized weapons and ammunition to the state treasury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1079/2025
The court stopped proceedings against the three respondents under Section 258 CrPC and acquitted them of charges under Section 12 of the Gujarat Arms Act. The court found that despite repeated summons and warrant issuance, the accused could not be produced before it. The court also directed the government to forfeit seized weapons and ammunition to the state treasury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts