THE STATE OF GUJARAT DATHA POLICE STATION vs kanjibhai karshnbhai dhapa — 1045/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN040018272025
e-Filing Number
11-07-2025
Filing Number
1045/2025
Filing Date
18-Jul-2025
Registration No
1045/2025
Registration Date
18-Jul-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALAJA
Judge
6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
78
Police Station
DATHA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT DATHA POLICE STATION
Respondent(s)
-
1.kanjibhai karshnbhai dhapa
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court convicted the respondent, Kanjibhai Karshnbhai Dhapa, under the Indian Penal Code Section 275 (adulterating articles of food or drink) after he pleaded guilty to the charges. Considering the respondent's poor socioeconomic background as a family-dependent laborer and mitigating circumstances, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine instead of the statutory imprisonment, while issuing a warning against future offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
13-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
09-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
18-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1045/2025
The court convicted the respondent, Kanjibhai Karshnbhai Dhapa, under the Indian Penal Code Section 275 (adulterating articles of food or drink) after he pleaded guilty to the charges. Considering the respondent's poor socioeconomic background as a family-dependent laborer and mitigating circumstances, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine instead of the statutory imprisonment, while issuing a warning against future offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts