THE STATE OF GUJARAT DATHA POLICE STATION vs TAKHUBHAI BACHUBHAI KAMALIYA — 844/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN040015632025
Filing Number
844/2025
Filing Date
04-07-2025
Registration No
844/2025
Registration Date
04-07-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALAJA
Judge
6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198014240282
Police Station
DATHA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT DATHA POLICE STATION
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
TAKHUBHAI BACHUBHAI KAMALIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
ORDER
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 06-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 23-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 13-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 844/2025 The State of Gujarat (Datha Police Station) v. Takhubhai Bachubhai Kamaliya The court convicted the respondent under IPC Section 275 (related to safety/security violations) and sentenced him to imprisonment with a fine of ₹100. However, recognizing mitigating circumstances—the respondent's status as a first-time offender from a poor, dependent family background—the court imposed a lenient sentence consisting of day-imprisonment rather than rigorous imprisonment, thereby reducing the hardship on the respondent's family's livelihood. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 844/2025 The State of Gujarat (Datha Police Station) v. Takhubhai Bachubhai Kamaliya The court convicted the respondent under IPC Section 275 (related to safety/security violations) and sentenced him to imprisonment with a fine of ₹100. However, recognizing mitigating circumstances—the respondent's status as a first-time offender from a poor, dependent family background—the court imposed a lenient sentence consisting of day-imprisonment rather than rigorous imprisonment, thereby reducing the hardship on the respondent's family's livelihood. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts