THE STATE OF GUJARAT DATHA POLICE STATION vs LABHUBEN W/O GANESHBHAI JADAVBHAI BAMBHANIYA — 661/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN040013002025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-03-2025

Filing Number

661/2025

Filing Date

23-05-2025

Registration No

661/2025

Registration Date

23-05-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA

Judge

6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

292

Police Station

DATHA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT DATHA POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

LABHUBEN W/O GANESHBHAI JADAVBHAI BAMBHANIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

ORDER

11-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

20-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

03-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted respondent Labhuben under Section 65(a)(a) of the Indian Penal Code 2023 for theft but reduced the sentence from the prescribed minimum to a fine of Rs. 100 with simple imprisonment as alternative, considering her status as the sole breadwinner of a poor family dependent on daily wages. The court applied the established principle that while conviction was warranted, lenient sentencing was justified due to compelling mitigating circumstances affecting her dependents' livelihood. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Labhuben under Section 65(a)(a) of the Indian Penal Code 2023 for theft but reduced the sentence from the prescribed minimum to a fine of Rs. 100 with simple imprisonment as alternative, considering her status as the sole breadwinner of a poor family dependent on daily wages. The court applied the established principle that while conviction was warranted, lenient sentencing was justified due to compelling mitigating circumstances affecting her dependents' livelihood. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case