NAHIDABEN IKRAMUDDIN ANSARI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT — 19/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY

CNR: GJBN040008412026

Filing Number

19/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

19/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA

Judge

6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAHIDABEN IKRAMUDDIN ANSARI

    Adv. H H TRIVEDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted Nahidaben Ikramuddin Ansari's application under Section 203 of the BNSS, ordering the return of ₹23,506 seized from her bank accounts following a cybercrime complaint. The court found that no FIR had been filed, no arrests made, and no other party claimed the funds, making her the entitled possessor. The court directed the release of frozen amounts from four banks within 10 days upon furnishing personal and surety bonds, subject to conditions that she produce the funds if required and not use them for unlawful purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted Nahidaben Ikramuddin Ansari's application under Section 203 of the BNSS, ordering the return of ₹23,506 seized from her bank accounts following a cybercrime complaint. The court found that no FIR had been filed, no arrests made, and no other party claimed the funds, making her the entitled possessor. The court directed the release of frozen amounts from four banks within 10 days upon furnishing personal and surety bonds, subject to conditions that she produce the funds if required and not use them for unlawful purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case