PGVCL TRAPAJ SUB DIVISION vs DALPATBHAI NANJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A P CHAUHAN — 85/2024
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 43,46. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBN040007672024
Filing Number
85/2024
Filing Date
01-Mar-2024
Registration No
85/2024
Registration Date
01-Mar-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALAJA
Judge
6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL TRAPAJ SUB DIVISION
Adv. K V VAIDYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.DALPATBHAI NANJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A P CHAUHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 85/2024 Court Decision: The court dismissed PGVCL's claim for electricity theft charges against defendant Dalpatbhai Nanjibhai Parmar. The court found that PGVCL failed to prove its allegations by preponderance of probabilities, the standard required in civil matters. The defendant's testimony, corroborated by documentary evidence, cast sufficient doubt on the plaintiff's case regarding the unauthorized electricity connection and consumption charges totaling ₹20,266.92. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Feb-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Jan-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Oct-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Sep-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Aug-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Nov-2024
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Oct-2024
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Sep-2024
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Sep-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Sep-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Aug-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Jul-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Jun-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-May-2024
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 85/2024
Case Summary: 85/2024 Court Decision: The court dismissed PGVCL's claim for electricity theft charges against defendant Dalpatbhai Nanjibhai Parmar. The court found that PGVCL failed to prove its allegations by preponderance of probabilities, the standard required in civil matters. The defendant's testimony, corroborated by documentary evidence, cast sufficient doubt on the plaintiff's case regarding the unauthorized electricity connection and consumption charges totaling ₹20,266.92. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts