THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SURESHBHAI VESUBHAI CHUDHARI — 434/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN040006692026

e-Filing Number

19-01-2026

Filing Number

434/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

434/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

283

Police Station

ALANG MARINE POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SURESHBHAI VESUBHAI CHUDHARI

  2. 2.RAMKUMAR RAMCHANDARKUMAR CHUDHARI

  3. 3.SANDIPKUMAR KAPILKUMAR BIND

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the three accused under Gujarat Excise Act Section 12 for illegal possession and consumption of liquor. Considering the accused were poor laborers supporting their families and it was their first offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 300 fine each (or 10 days imprisonment in default) instead of the maximum penalty, while ordering confiscation of the seized liquor and recovery of duty amounts to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 434/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the three accused under Gujarat Excise Act Section 12 for illegal possession and consumption of liquor. Considering the accused were poor laborers supporting their families and it was their first offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 300 fine each (or 10 days imprisonment in default) instead of the maximum penalty, while ordering confiscation of the seized liquor and recovery of duty amounts to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case