THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BANSIBHAI GHUSABHAI CHUDASAMA — 408/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN040006352026

e-Filing Number

03-02-2026

Filing Number

408/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

408/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

43

Police Station

ALANG POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BANSIBHAI GHUSABHAI CHUDASAMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Bansibhai Ghusabhai Chudasama (408/2026) The court convicted the respondent under IPC Section 135 (unlawful possession of pipe) but modified the sentence from imprisonment to a fine of ₹200 with six months' simple imprisonment as alternative, considering his status as a poor family man and first-time offender whose imprisonment would burden his dependents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 408/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Bansibhai Ghusabhai Chudasama (408/2026) The court convicted the respondent under IPC Section 135 (unlawful possession of pipe) but modified the sentence from imprisonment to a fine of ₹200 with six months' simple imprisonment as alternative, considering his status as a poor family man and first-time offender whose imprisonment would burden his dependents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case