THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs HARPALSINH BATUKSINH GOHIL — 396/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN040006232026
e-Filing Number
19-01-2026
Filing Number
396/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
396/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALAJA
Judge
1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
4
Police Station
ALANG POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
-
1.HARPALSINH BATUKSINH GOHIL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court stopped proceedings against the accused Harpalsinh Batuksinh Gohil under CrPC Section 258 and acquitted him of charges under IPC Sections 396(1) and 85(1)(2). The court found that despite repeated summons and warrants, the accused remained absent, and the government failed to produce evidence, leading to the dismissal of the case with no bar to future prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 396/2026
The court stopped proceedings against the accused Harpalsinh Batuksinh Gohil under CrPC Section 258 and acquitted him of charges under IPC Sections 396(1) and 85(1)(2). The court found that despite repeated summons and warrants, the accused remained absent, and the government failed to produce evidence, leading to the dismissal of the case with no bar to future prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts