THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs LALCHAND RAMKISHAN PASVAN — 395/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN040006222026

e-Filing Number

19-01-2026

Filing Number

395/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

395/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

511

Police Station

ALANG POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LALCHAND RAMKISHAN PASVAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court stopped proceedings against the accused (Lalchand Ramkishan Pasvan) under CrPC Section 258 and acquitted him of the charges under IPC Sections 447(1) and 85(1)(2). The court found that despite repeated summons and warrants, the accused could not be produced before it, making continuation of the case impractical, and therefore discharged him from the criminal charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 395/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings against the accused (Lalchand Ramkishan Pasvan) under CrPC Section 258 and acquitted him of the charges under IPC Sections 447(1) and 85(1)(2). The court found that despite repeated summons and warrants, the accused could not be produced before it, making continuation of the case impractical, and therefore discharged him from the criminal charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case