PARESHBHAI NATHABHAI RATHOD vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT — 10/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY

CNR: GJBN040005402026

Filing Number

10/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

10/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA

Judge

6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARESHBHAI NATHABHAI RATHOD

    Adv. V P JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted petitioner Pareshbhai Nathabhai Rathod's petition under CrPC Section 503, ordering return of ₹55,499 seized from his bank accounts during a cyber fraud investigation. The court found no FIR registered against him, no evidence linking him to the crime, and noted the seizure occurred under Section 106 CrPC without proper legal basis. The funds must be restored to Rathod's State Bank of India account upon submission of a bond, with specific conditions that he not misuse the money and cooperate with ongoing investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    For Report Police Inquiry

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    For Report Police Inquiry

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted petitioner Pareshbhai Nathabhai Rathod's petition under CrPC Section 503, ordering return of ₹55,499 seized from his bank accounts during a cyber fraud investigation. The court found no FIR registered against him, no evidence linking him to the crime, and noted the seizure occurred under Section 106 CrPC without proper legal basis. The funds must be restored to Rathod's State Bank of India account upon submission of a bond, with specific conditions that he not misuse the money and cooperate with ongoing investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case