THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION vs SAILESHSINH VANRAJSINH GOHIL — 293/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN040004912026

e-Filing Number

03-02-2026

Filing Number

293/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

293/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

23

Police Station

ALANG POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAILESHSINH VANRAJSINH GOHIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused Saileshsinh Vanrajsinh Gohil guilty under sections 66(1)B and 8P(1)(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act-1949. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime, and considering it was his first offense, his poor financial condition, and lack of harm to others, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine with 10 days simple imprisonment as an alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 293/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused Saileshsinh Vanrajsinh Gohil guilty under sections 66(1)B and 8P(1)(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act-1949. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime, and considering it was his first offense, his poor financial condition, and lack of harm to others, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine with 10 days simple imprisonment as an alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case