THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION vs mukeshabhai bavachandbhai makavana — 289/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN040004872026

e-Filing Number

12-01-2026

Filing Number

289/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

289/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

531

Police Station

ALANG POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.mukeshabhai bavachandbhai makavana

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused, Mukeshabhai Bavachandbhai Makavana, guilty under sections 66(1)B and 87(1)(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. Given that the accused voluntarily confessed, this was his first offense, and he caused no actual harm, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹200 and 10 days simple imprisonment, with the option of paying the fine to avoid jail time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 289/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Mukeshabhai Bavachandbhai Makavana, guilty under sections 66(1)B and 87(1)(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. Given that the accused voluntarily confessed, this was his first offense, and he caused no actual harm, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹200 and 10 days simple imprisonment, with the option of paying the fine to avoid jail time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case