THE STATE OF GUJARAT TALAJA POLICE STATION vs CHETANBHAI PACHABHAI DABHI — 222/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN040003872026

e-Filing Number

11-12-2025

Filing Number

222/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

222/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

796

Police Station

TALAJA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT TALAJA POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHETANBHAI PACHABHAI DABHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted respondent Chetanbhai Pachabhai Dabhi under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)B and 85(1)(2) after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering this was his first offense, his impoverished condition, and lack of harm to any third party, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine and 10 days simple imprisonment, giving him an opportunity for reform. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 222/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Chetanbhai Pachabhai Dabhi under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)B and 85(1)(2) after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering this was his first offense, his impoverished condition, and lack of harm to any third party, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine and 10 days simple imprisonment, giving him an opportunity for reform. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case