THE STATE OF GUJARAT TALAJA POLICE STATION vs MAHESHBHAI URFE MITHUNBHAI BHAKTUBHAI BARAIYA — 193/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN040003122026

e-Filing Number

12-11-2025

Filing Number

193/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

193/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

733

Police Station

TALAJA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2)

Petitioner(s)

1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT TALAJA POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

1.MAHESHBHAI URFE MITHUNBHAI BHAKTUBHAI BARAIYA

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

Case Summary: 193/2026 The court ordered a stay of proceedings under CrPC Section 258 against the respondent Maheshbhai Urfe Mithunbhai Bhaktubhai Baraiya, who was charged under IPC Sections 447(1) and 85(1)(2). The respondent was acquitted and discharged from the criminal charges after multiple summons failed to secure his attendance in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
13-Mar-2026

Process To Accused

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
02-Mar-2026

Process To Accused

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
20-Feb-2026

Process To Accused

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
28-Jan-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
28-Jan-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 193/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 193/2026 The court ordered a stay of proceedings under CrPC Section 258 against the respondent Maheshbhai Urfe Mithunbhai Bhaktubhai Baraiya, who was charged under IPC Sections 447(1) and 85(1)(2). The respondent was acquitted and discharged from the criminal charges after multiple summons failed to secure his attendance in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.