CANARA BANK SAROJKUMAR PRUSTY vs VISHWAS COTEX, A PARTNERSHIP FRIME — 44/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJBN040002892026
Filing Number
44/2026
Filing Date
22-01-2026
Registration No
44/2026
Registration Date
22-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALAJA
Judge
6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CANARA BANK SAROJKUMAR PRUSTY
Adv. V C BHIL
Respondent(s)
VISHWAS COTEX, A PARTNERSHIP FRIME
PANCHA DOSTMAHMAND GAFARBHAI
KALASARIYA JIGNESH NANABHAI
KALSARIYA BHARGAV MANSUKHBHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT |
| 02-03-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT |
| 28-02-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
| 21-02-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Misc. Application No. 44/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Talaja, allowed Canara Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFESI Act, 2002. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of mortgaged industrial property (8,903 sq. meters of land with 881.09 sq. meters of construction) located in Village Hajipur, Talaja, Gujarat, and forward it to the bank. The bank had complied with statutory requirements including issuance of demand notice and possession notice, which the borrowers (Vishwas Cotex partnership and guarantors) failed to respond to or comply with. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Criminal Misc. Application No. 44/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Talaja, allowed Canara Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFESI Act, 2002. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of mortgaged industrial property (8,903 sq. meters of land with 881.09 sq. meters of construction) located in Village Hajipur, Talaja, Gujarat, and forward it to the bank. The bank had complied with statutory requirements including issuance of demand notice and possession notice, which the borrowers (Vishwas Cotex partnership and guarantors) failed to respond to or comply with. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts