THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG MARINE POLICE STATION vs AMITBHAI BHARATBHAI VEITHA — 142/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN040002012026

e-Filing Number

12-01-2026

Filing Number

142/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

142/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

282

Police Station

ALANG MARINE POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG MARINE POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMITBHAI BHARATBHAI VEITHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found respondent Amitbhai Bharatbhai Veitha guilty under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)B and 87(1)(2) after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Given it was his first offense, his impoverished circumstances, and the absence of harm to others, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹200 with 10 days simple imprisonment in default, showing leniency for reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 142/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found respondent Amitbhai Bharatbhai Veitha guilty under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)B and 87(1)(2) after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Given it was his first offense, his impoverished circumstances, and the absence of harm to others, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹200 with 10 days simple imprisonment in default, showing leniency for reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case