THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG MARINE POLICE STATION vs SHANKARGIRI RUGANATHGIRI MEDHANATH — 129/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN040001852026

e-Filing Number

12-01-2026

Filing Number

129/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

129/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

275

Police Station

ALANG MARINE POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG MARINE POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHANKARGIRI RUGANATHGIRI MEDHANATH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court disposed of the case against respondent Shankargiri Ruganathgiri Medhanath by stopping proceedings under CrPC Section 258, acquitting the accused of all charges. The court found that despite repeated summons and warrants, the accused did not appear, and therefore exercised its discretion to terminate the prosecution, freeing the accused from the criminal charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 129/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the case against respondent Shankargiri Ruganathgiri Medhanath by stopping proceedings under CrPC Section 258, acquitting the accused of all charges. The court found that despite repeated summons and warrants, the accused did not appear, and therefore exercised its discretion to terminate the prosecution, freeing the accused from the criminal charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case