THE STATE OF GUJARAT TALAJA POLICE STATION vs ashvingiri aravindgiri gausvami — 82/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN040001132026
e-Filing Number
12-11-2025
Filing Number
82/2026
Filing Date
12-Jan-2026
Registration No
82/2026
Registration Date
12-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALAJA
Judge
1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
749
Police Station
TALAJA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT TALAJA POLICE STATION
Respondent(s)
-
1.ashvingiri aravindgiri gausvami
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 82/2026 The court ordered the cessation of proceedings against respondent Ashvingiri Aravindgiri Gauswami under CrPC Section 258 and acquitted him of the charges. The court found that despite repeated summons and warrants issued against the accused, he failed to appear before the court, and consequently proceedings were terminated with orders that no future case could be initiated against him for the same offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 82/2026
Case Summary: 82/2026 The court ordered the cessation of proceedings against respondent Ashvingiri Aravindgiri Gauswami under CrPC Section 258 and acquitted him of the charges. The court found that despite repeated summons and warrants issued against the accused, he failed to appear before the court, and consequently proceedings were terminated with orders that no future case could be initiated against him for the same offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts