THE STATE OF GUJARAT TALAJA POLICE STATION vs DILIPBHAI URFE KANO NATUBHAI CHAUHAN — 71/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN040001022026
e-Filing Number
12-11-2025
Filing Number
71/2026
Filing Date
12-Jan-2026
Registration No
71/2026
Registration Date
12-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALAJA
Judge
1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
705
Police Station
TALAJA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT TALAJA POLICE STATION
Respondent(s)
-
1.DILIPBHAI URFE KANO NATUBHAI CHAUHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The accused Dilipbhai Urfe Kano Natubhai Chauhan was convicted under Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 66(1)B and 85(1)(2) for unlawful possession/consumption of alcohol. He voluntarily confessed to the charges, and the court, considering it his first offense, his poverty, and lack of harm to others, imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine with 10 days simple imprisonment as alternative punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 71/2026
The accused Dilipbhai Urfe Kano Natubhai Chauhan was convicted under Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 66(1)B and 85(1)(2) for unlawful possession/consumption of alcohol. He voluntarily confessed to the charges, and the court, considering it his first offense, his poverty, and lack of harm to others, imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine with 10 days simple imprisonment as alternative punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts