THE STATE OF GUJARAT TALAJA POLICE STATION vs KALUBHAI GOVINDBHAI DODIYA — 68/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN040000992026
e-Filing Number
12-11-2025
Filing Number
68/2026
Filing Date
12-Jan-2026
Registration No
68/2026
Registration Date
12-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALAJA
Judge
1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
702
Police Station
TALAJA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT TALAJA POLICE STATION
Respondent(s)
-
1.KALUBHAI GOVINDBHAI DODIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court granted a Stop Proceeding under CrPC Section 258 in the case against respondent Kalubhai Govindbhai Dodiya, acquitting him of criminal charges under Sections 114(1) and 85(1)(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The judgment, delivered on March 14, 2026, also directed that no future case can be filed against the respondent based on the same facts, as the accused had appeared before the court and the government failed to substantiate the charges despite repeated summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 68/2026
The court granted a Stop Proceeding under CrPC Section 258 in the case against respondent Kalubhai Govindbhai Dodiya, acquitting him of criminal charges under Sections 114(1) and 85(1)(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The judgment, delivered on March 14, 2026, also directed that no future case can be filed against the respondent based on the same facts, as the accused had appeared before the court and the government failed to substantiate the charges despite repeated summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts