THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION vs SAGARAMBHAI AMBARAMBHAI VAGHELA — 57/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN040000862026

e-Filing Number

21-11-2025

Filing Number

57/2026

Filing Date

09-Jan-2026

Registration No

57/2026

Registration Date

09-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALAJA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

477

Police Station

ALANG POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1),85(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT ALANG POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAGARAMBHAI AMBARAMBHAI VAGHELA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court discharged respondent Sagarambhai Ambarambhai Vaghela by stopping proceedings under CrPC Section 258, finding that despite repeated summons and warrants, the accused failed to appear before the court. The court directed that no future case could be filed against the respondent for the same charges, and ordered that the government and police provide the respondent's details to prevent any further legal action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 57/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged respondent Sagarambhai Ambarambhai Vaghela by stopping proceedings under CrPC Section 258, finding that despite repeated summons and warrants, the accused failed to appear before the court. The court directed that no future case could be filed against the respondent for the same charges, and ordered that the government and police provide the respondent's details to prevent any further legal action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case