BHAGHUBEN RANABHAI LEGAL HAIR OF LATE RANABHAI JADAVBHAI SOLANKI vs DANJIBHAI AMARABHAI BHALIYA Advocate - J D GHELANI — 140/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 31,34,38. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 28th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBN030011282022
Filing Number
140/2022
Filing Date
16-Jul-2022
Registration No
140/2022
Registration Date
16-Jul-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, GHOGHA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHAGHUBEN RANABHAI LEGAL HAIR OF LATE RANABHAI JADAVBHAI SOLANKI
Adv. P P JADEJA
-
2.SOLANKI GHUSABHAI RANABHAI
-
3.SOLANKI DULABHAI RANABHAI
-
4.SOLANKI VIJAYBHAI RANABHAI
-
5.SOLANKI HARESHBHAI RANABHAI
-
6.SOLANKI BUDHABHAI RANABHAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.DANJIBHAI AMARABHAI BHALIYA Advocate - J D GHELANI
-
2.KAJALBA KIRATSANG W/O. HARENDRASINH RANUBHA GOHIL
Adv. V R GOHEL
-
3.LEENABA NAVALSANG @ NAVALSINH JADEJA W/O. PRATIKRAJSINH GOHIL
-
4.RAJDIPISNH NAVALSANG @ NAVALSANG JADEJA
-
5.TEJALBA NAVALSANG @ NAVALSINH JADEJA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the petitioners' case for default due to their continued non-appearance and lack of prosecution despite multiple hearings on issues 5, 6, and 37. The petitioners, who sought to cancel sale deeds and obtain a permanent injunction, failed to demonstrate commitment to the case, prompting the court to dismiss it for want of effective prosecution. The petitioners were ordered to bear the costs of the litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jan-2026
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Nov-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Sep-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Aug-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Jun-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Apr-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Mar-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Dec-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Nov-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Sep-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Aug-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Jun-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Mar-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Mar-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jan-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Dec-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Nov-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Sep-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Sep-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Aug-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Jul-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jun-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Apr-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Mar-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Jan-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Dec-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Nov-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Oct-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Aug-2022
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jul-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 140/2022
The court dismissed the petitioners' case for default due to their continued non-appearance and lack of prosecution despite multiple hearings on issues 5, 6, and 37. The petitioners, who sought to cancel sale deeds and obtain a permanent injunction, failed to demonstrate commitment to the case, prompting the court to dismiss it for want of effective prosecution. The petitioners were ordered to bear the costs of the litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts