AXIS BANK LTD THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER GOPAL DAS vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION — 1245/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 403. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION -
CNR: GJBN020235902025
Filing Number
1245/2025
Filing Date
09-Oct-2025
Registration No
1245/2025
Registration Date
09-Oct-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AXIS BANK LTD THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER GOPAL DAS
Adv. J S BAMBHANIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION
-
2.BHIMAJIBHAI NARSHIBHAI DHEDHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed Axis Bank's petition seeking clarification and modification of a prior order regarding the recovery of funds allegedly involved in cyber fraud perpetrated by Bhimajibhai Narshibhai Dhedhi. The court found that Axis Bank failed to comply with an earlier order (dated 09/09/2023) directing the bank to deposit the frozen amount (₹40,000) into Dhedhi's account, and ruled that since the bank account contained sufficient balance, no grounds existed to delay compliance with the judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Feb-2026
Process To Opponent
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Dec-2025
Process To Opponent
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1245/2025
The court dismissed Axis Bank's petition seeking clarification and modification of a prior order regarding the recovery of funds allegedly involved in cyber fraud perpetrated by Bhimajibhai Narshibhai Dhedhi. The court found that Axis Bank failed to comply with an earlier order (dated 09/09/2023) directing the bank to deposit the frozen amount (₹40,000) into Dhedhi's account, and ruled that since the bank account contained sufficient balance, no grounds existed to delay compliance with the judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts