UMESHBHAI RUDABHAI SANGA vs MANGALSIKKA REKHABEN ASHOKBHAI PROP. OF RAJKHODAL PETROLIUM Advocate - M N DESAI — 11587/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,141. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN020153402023

Filing Number

11587/2023

Filing Date

03-Oct-2023

Registration No

11587/2023

Registration Date

03-Oct-2023

Court

CIVIL COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

7-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,141

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UMESHBHAI RUDABHAI SANGA

    Adv. S M RADHANPURI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANGALSIKKA REKHABEN ASHOKBHAI PROP. OF RAJKHODAL PETROLIUM Advocate - M N DESAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 11587/2023 Court: 2nd Additional Senior Civil Judge & ACJM, Bhavnagar Decided: 27 April 2026 Duration: 2 years, 6 months, 24 days Key Facts Petitioner Umeshbhai Rudabhai Sanga filed a complaint against respondent Mangalsikka Rekhaben Ashokbhai (proprietor of Raj Khodal Petroleum) under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138. The petitioner alleged that the respondent issued three cheques totaling ₹4,00,000 which were dishonored due to insufficient funds or account blocks. Court's Decision JUDGMENT: Partly Allowed The court found the petitioner proved his case under Section 138 of the NI Act regarding the cheque dishonors. However, the court held that one cheque's dishonor resulted from an "Account Blocked" status (not fund insufficiency), which does not attract penal liability. The court ordered the respondent to pay ₹2,50,000 bail bond and directed that the Income Tax Department be notified regarding cash transactions exceeding ₹2,00,000 for verification of Income Tax Act compliance, particularly Section 269SS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 07-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  10. 05-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  11. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  12. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  13. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  14. 16-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  15. 09-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  16. 09-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  17. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  18. 28-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  19. 16-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  20. 15-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  21. 12-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  22. 07-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  23. 22-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  24. 10-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  25. 16-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  26. 22-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  27. 05-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  28. 27-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  29. 06-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  30. 06-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 03-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11587/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 11587/2023 Court: 2nd Additional Senior Civil Judge & ACJM, Bhavnagar Decided: 27 April 2026 Duration: 2 years, 6 months, 24 days Key Facts Petitioner Umeshbhai Rudabhai Sanga filed a complaint against respondent Mangalsikka Rekhaben Ashokbhai (proprietor of Raj Khodal Petroleum) under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138. The petitioner alleged that the respondent issued three cheques totaling ₹4,00,000 which were dishonored due to insufficient funds or account blocks. Court's Decision JUDGMENT: Partly Allowed The court found the petitioner proved his case under Section 138 of the NI Act regarding the cheque dishonors. However, the court held that one cheque's dishonor resulted from an "Account Blocked" status (not fund insufficiency), which does not attract penal liability. The court ordered the respondent to pay ₹2,50,000 bail bond and directed that the Income Tax Department be notified regarding cash transactions exceeding ₹2,00,000 for verification of Income Tax Act compliance, particularly Section 269SS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case