JASABHAI KESHAVBHAI BARAIYA vs JITESHBHAI VALJIBHAI RATHOD Advocate - B K VAGHELA — 4509/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 06th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN020064982025
Filing Number
4509/2025
Filing Date
04-Jun-2025
Registration No
4509/2025
Registration Date
04-Jun-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
7-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JASABHAI KESHAVBHAI BARAIYA
Adv. A V CHUDASAMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.JITESHBHAI VALJIBHAI RATHOD Advocate - B K VAGHELA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court disposed of the criminal case by ordering that it be filed in the daily miscellaneous court, with settlement reached between the parties. The judgment notes that the Negotiable Instruments Act was properly applied, and no punishment was warranted under established legal principles, resulting in the case being disposed of based on the withdrawal petition filed by the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 4509/2025
The court disposed of the criminal case by ordering that it be filed in the daily miscellaneous court, with settlement reached between the parties. The judgment notes that the Negotiable Instruments Act was properly applied, and no punishment was warranted under established legal principles, resulting in the case being disposed of based on the withdrawal petition filed by the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts