THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs CHETANBHAI SON OF PRAVINBHAI SARVAIYA Advocate - B M CHAUHAN — 3545/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,325,427,504,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN020038472023

Filing Number

3545/2023

Filing Date

30-Jan-2023

Registration No

3545/2023

Registration Date

30-Jan-2023

Court

CIVIL COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198015211015

Police Station

BOR TALAV POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,325,427,504,506(2),114
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHETANBHAI SON OF PRAVINBHAI SARVAIYA Advocate - B M CHAUHAN

  2. 2.MUKESHBHAI SON OF GORDHANBHAI SARVAIYA

  3. 3.DIPAKBHAI ALIAS RAHUL ALIAS DAUD SON OF PRAHUBHAI BARAIYA

  4. 4.SHANKARBHAI ALIAS SANJAY SON OF PRABHUBHAI BARAIYA

  5. 5.BARAT ALIAS BHODI SON OF BATUKBHAI SARVAIYA

  6. 6.VIAJYBHAI SON OF BATUKBHAI SARVAIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of Case 3545/2023 The court acquitted all six accused of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 323, 325, 427, 504, 506(2), 114 and Gujarat Police Act section 135. The prosecution failed to establish the alleged assault and common intention charges beyond reasonable doubt, as witness testimonies were inconsistent and insufficient to prove the offence. The court found the police investigation inadequate to support the charges against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 23-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 14-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 08-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 10-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 09-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 22-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 06-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 31-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 01-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 10-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 29-Mar-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 15-Feb-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 03-Jan-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 09-Nov-2023

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 27-Sep-2023

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 24-Aug-2023

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 01-Aug-2023

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 14-Jun-2023

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 18-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 30-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3545/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 3545/2023 The court acquitted all six accused of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 323, 325, 427, 504, 506(2), 114 and Gujarat Police Act section 135. The prosecution failed to establish the alleged assault and common intention charges beyond reasonable doubt, as witness testimonies were inconsistent and insufficient to prove the offence. The court found the police investigation inadequate to support the charges against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case