THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ASHVINBHAI@ VISHAL@ DADHO S/O JAGADISHBHAI BARAIYA Advocate - J U MEHTA — 2458/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,504,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN020036772022

Filing Number

2458/2022

Filing Date

27-Apr-2022

Registration No

2458/2022

Registration Date

27-Apr-2022

Court

CIVIL COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198015210958

Police Station

BOR TALAV POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,504,506(2),114
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHVINBHAI@ VISHAL@ DADHO S/O JAGADISHBHAI BARAIYA Advocate - J U MEHTA

  2. 2.SANJAYBHAI@ GABBAR S/O JAGDISHBHAI BARAIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: CC/2458/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Ashvinbhai and Sanjaybhai) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 323, 324, 504, 506(2), 114, and Gujarat Police Act section 135. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the alleged assault and threats against the complainant, as witness testimonies lacked credibility and corroboration. Key Reasoning: Despite the FIR alleging that the accused caused grievous injuries using weapons and threatened the complainant, the prosecution failed to establish a reliable case. The witnesses' statements contained inconsistencies, and their testimonies did not provide the necessary evidentiary support required to convict the accused beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 18-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 09-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 03-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 29-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 20-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 07-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 22-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 06-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 31-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 01-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 10-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 28-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 20-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 10-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 22-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 25-Sep-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 08-Aug-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 06-Jul-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 05-Jun-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 07-Apr-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 02-Feb-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 08-Dec-2022

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  32. 06-Oct-2022

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 07-Jul-2022

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  34. 27-May-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 27-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2458/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC/2458/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Ashvinbhai and Sanjaybhai) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 323, 324, 504, 506(2), 114, and Gujarat Police Act section 135. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the alleged assault and threats against the complainant, as witness testimonies lacked credibility and corroboration. Key Reasoning: Despite the FIR alleging that the accused caused grievous injuries using weapons and threatened the complainant, the prosecution failed to establish a reliable case. The witnesses' statements contained inconsistencies, and their testimonies did not provide the necessary evidentiary support required to convict the accused beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case