CHOLA MANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE CO. LTD THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED PERSON MEHUL POPATBHAI ZANZMERA vs RAJESHBHAI BHIKHABHAI CHONDAGAR — 401/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN020006332026

Filing Number

401/2026

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Registration No

401/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

7-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHOLA MANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE CO. LTD THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED PERSON MEHUL POPATBHAI ZANZMERA

    Adv. H M KUKADIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJESHBHAI BHIKHABHAI CHONDAGAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court approved the petitioner's withdrawal petition in this Negotiable Instruments Act case registered under CC No. 401/2026 at Bhavnagar Special Negotiable Court. The parties had settled their dispute, and following Supreme Court precedent on legal services authority, the court found it appropriate to permit the withdrawal and referred the case to Lok Adalat for final resolution based on the settlement reached between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 401/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court approved the petitioner's withdrawal petition in this Negotiable Instruments Act case registered under CC No. 401/2026 at Bhavnagar Special Negotiable Court. The parties had settled their dispute, and following Supreme Court precedent on legal services authority, the court found it appropriate to permit the withdrawal and referred the case to Lok Adalat for final resolution based on the settlement reached between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case