PUNABHAI ODHABHAI GOHIL vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 253/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJBN010050952025

Filing Number

253/2025

Filing Date

04-Dec-2025

Registration No

253/2025

Registration Date

04-Dec-2025

Court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUNABHAI ODHABHAI GOHIL

    Adv. N R CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

  2. 2.GOVINDBHAI BHANABHAI DHAMELIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court set aside the trial court's conviction of appellant Punabhai Odhabhai Gohil under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (which had sentenced him to two years imprisonment and Rs. 1,00,000 fine) and acquitted him based on a compromise settlement reached between the appellant and the original complainant. The court waived costs, ordered refund of Rs. 20,000 deposited as security and any fine paid, discharged the bail bond, and directed return of the passport if deposited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 04-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 253/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court set aside the trial court's conviction of appellant Punabhai Odhabhai Gohil under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (which had sentenced him to two years imprisonment and Rs. 1,00,000 fine) and acquitted him based on a compromise settlement reached between the appellant and the original complainant. The court waived costs, ordered refund of Rs. 20,000 deposited as security and any fine paid, discharged the bail bond, and directed return of the passport if deposited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case