SANDIPBHAI JITENDRABHAI PATEL vs RAJIV GUPTA — 134/2023
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.
CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT
CNR: GJBN010044392023
Filing Number
134/2023
Filing Date
11-10-2023
Registration No
134/2023
Registration Date
11-10-2023
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANDIPBHAI JITENDRABHAI PATEL
Adv. P A DESAI
Respondent(s)
RAJIV GUPTA
SANJIV GUPTA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 02-02-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
| 15-01-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
| 01-01-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District Judge, Bhavnagar dismissed Sandipbhai Jitendrabhai Patel's application seeking condonation of 86 days delay in filing a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the CPC. The court found that a revision application under Section 115 was not maintainable before the District Court and therefore dismissed the application without examining its merits, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District Judge, Bhavnagar dismissed Sandipbhai Jitendrabhai Patel's application seeking condonation of 86 days delay in filing a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the CPC. The court found that a revision application under Section 115 was not maintainable before the District Court and therefore dismissed the application without examining its merits, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts