KANTIBHAI POPATBHAI RATHOD PROPRIETOR OF JAY BHAVANI INDUSTRIES vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 178/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISED on 15th April 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJBN010040832025

Case disposed

Filing Number

178/2025

Filing Date

10-09-2025

Registration No

178/2025

Registration Date

10-09-2025

Court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPROMISED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 415
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

KANTIBHAI POPATBHAI RATHOD PROPRIETOR OF JAY BHAVANI INDUSTRIES

Adv. S V JOSHI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

PIYUSHBHAI SHAILESHBHAI PATEL PROPRIETOR OF AMBICA ENTERPRISE

Adv. V B RANA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

15-04-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

13-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

13-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

05-01-2026

FINAL HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

15-04-2026
ORDER

In Criminal Appeal No. 178/2025, the Sessions Judge Bhavnagar set aside the trial court's conviction of Kantibhai Popatbhai Rathod under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, which had sentenced him to three months imprisonment and Rs. 4,40,491 compensation. The appellant and complainant Piyushbhai Shaileshbhai Patel reached a compromise settlement during the appeal, and the court accepted it, acquitting the accused and waiving all costs and refunding any fine paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In Criminal Appeal No. 178/2025, the Sessions Judge Bhavnagar set aside the trial court's conviction of Kantibhai Popatbhai Rathod under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, which had sentenced him to three months imprisonment and Rs. 4,40,491 compensation. The appellant and complainant Piyushbhai Shaileshbhai Patel reached a compromise settlement during the appeal, and the court accepted it, acquitting the accused and waiving all costs and refunding any fine paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case