KANTIBHAI POPATBHAI RATHOD PROPRIETOR OF JAY BHAVANI INDUSTRIES vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 177/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISED on 15th April 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJBN010040822025
Filing Number
177/2025
Filing Date
10-09-2025
Registration No
177/2025
Registration Date
10-09-2025
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KANTIBHAI POPATBHAI RATHOD PROPRIETOR OF JAY BHAVANI INDUSTRIES
Adv. S V JOSHI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
PIYUSHBHAI SHAILESHBHAI PATEL PROPRIETOR OF AMBICA ENTERPRISE
Adv. V B RANA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 13-02-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 05-01-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The appellate court set aside the trial court's conviction of Kantibhai Popatbhai Rathod under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (which had imposed three months imprisonment and Rs. 5 lakh compensation) and acquitted him after the appellant and original complainant Piyushbhai Shaileshbhai Patel reached a settlement during appeal. The court waived court costs and ordered refund of any fine paid, recognizing the settlement resulted from positive attitude of both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The appellate court set aside the trial court's conviction of Kantibhai Popatbhai Rathod under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (which had imposed three months imprisonment and Rs. 5 lakh compensation) and acquitted him after the appellant and original complainant Piyushbhai Shaileshbhai Patel reached a settlement during appeal. The court waived court costs and ordered refund of any fine paid, recognizing the settlement resulted from positive attitude of both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts