MANISHKUMAR OMPRAKASH JALANI PROPRIETOR OF TRAY AND JEWELS vs SANDEEPBHAI RAVJIBHAI MANGUKIYA Advocate - R L PATEL — 155/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJBN010035752025
Filing Number
155/2025
Filing Date
08-Aug-2025
Registration No
155/2025
Registration Date
08-Aug-2025
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANISHKUMAR OMPRAKASH JALANI PROPRIETOR OF TRAY AND JEWELS
Adv. J D KEDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANDEEPBHAI RAVJIBHAI MANGUKIYA Advocate - R L PATEL
-
2.STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH DGP BHAVNAGAR
Adv. APP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 155-2025 Court Decision: The appeal of Manishkumar Omprakash Jalani (proprietor of Tray and Jewels) against a lower court conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act was dismissed. The trial court's conviction and sentence of six months imprisonment plus compensation of Rs. 5,93,228 were upheld, as the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption that a bounced cheque was issued to discharge a legal debt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Final Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Final Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Final Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Final Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
17-Oct-2025
Final Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 155/2025
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 155-2025 Court Decision: The appeal of Manishkumar Omprakash Jalani (proprietor of Tray and Jewels) against a lower court conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act was dismissed. The trial court's conviction and sentence of six months imprisonment plus compensation of Rs. 5,93,228 were upheld, as the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption that a bounced cheque was issued to discharge a legal debt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts