MANISHKUMAR OMPRAKASH JALANI PROPRIETOR OF TRAY AND JEWELS vs SANDEEPBHAI RAVJIBHAI MANGUKIYA Advocate - R L PATEL — 155/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJBN010035752025

Case disposed

Filing Number

155/2025

Filing Date

08-08-2025

Registration No

155/2025

Registration Date

08-08-2025

Court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 415
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

MANISHKUMAR OMPRAKASH JALANI PROPRIETOR OF TRAY AND JEWELS

Adv. J D KEDA

Respondent(s)

SANDEEPBHAI RAVJIBHAI MANGUKIYA Advocate - R L PATEL

STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH DGP BHAVNAGAR

Adv. APP

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

13-03-2026

Disposed

27-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

28-01-2026

FINAL HEARING

23-01-2026

FINAL HEARING

09-01-2026

FINAL HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 155-2025 Court Decision: The appeal of Manishkumar Omprakash Jalani (proprietor of Tray and Jewels) against a lower court conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act was dismissed. The trial court's conviction and sentence of six months imprisonment plus compensation of Rs. 5,93,228 were upheld, as the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption that a bounced cheque was issued to discharge a legal debt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 155-2025 Court Decision: The appeal of Manishkumar Omprakash Jalani (proprietor of Tray and Jewels) against a lower court conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act was dismissed. The trial court's conviction and sentence of six months imprisonment plus compensation of Rs. 5,93,228 were upheld, as the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption that a bounced cheque was issued to discharge a legal debt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case